Frequently Asked Questions 

Key Messages

Reduces insecurity and Stabilizes

The relationship between poverty and recidivism is straightforward: people living in poverty are more likely to recidivate, because poverty decreases opportunities in the formal economy. By directly confronting the poverty that underlies many cases of recidivism, we can promote public safety and economic growth.

Click to learn more

Arrives at the most critical time

The first 72 hours after release from prison are critical. By the time an individual has check-in with a supervising authority, they are likely already experiencing food insecurity. This is exacerbated by hurdles such as being released without the proper identification, or by outstanding justice-related debt.

Click to learn more

Responsive and flexible

People returning from prison navigate similar challenges, but entirely unique physical, psychological and economic situations.

Cash payments are the most flexible approach we can implement to adequately address diverse needs.

Click to learn more

Evidence based solution

A growing number of policy analyses highlight the impact of cash on improving reentry outcomes. People have utilized payments to get to work, to pay victim restitution and more quickly reach self-sufficiency. Early evidence also suggests that financial assistance upon release improves recidivism outcomes and can reduce rates of re-arrest by up to 30%.

Click to learn more

Promotes self-sufficiency

Fostering independent decision-making is crucial for successful reintegration. Reentry cash not only empowers individuals by showcasing trust and respect, but does so without burdening them with excessive reporting or restrictions, promoting dignity in the process.

Click to learn more

Results with lasting impact

Evaluations of direct-cash programs, such as the Returning Citizens Stimulus program, showed that positive results (such as increases in earnings and employment retention) were sustained by recipients, even after the payments stopped.

Click to learn more

Model Language

The language in this section is a framework to use and tailor for individual states and/or state agencies. Every state/agency has differing structures for how statutory language, budget language, and administrative rules/policies are written. For statutory language in particular, it is important to consider what, if any, existing statutory language needs to be referenced or struck so as to eliminate any conflicting language.

RESOURCES & FURTHER READING:

For questions, contact team@betterreentry.org